Legal Opinion

Scroggin v. Wood

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 31, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

"Appeal from Adair District Cov/rt. — Hon. A. ,W. Wilkinson, Judge. Action upon a promissory note. Trial by jury. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

i. sale of stai- ■ pretktion of contract. — I. The note upon which the suit was brought is for the sum of five hundred and sixty-six dollars and sixty-six cents, dated April '5, 1888. It is payable to the defendant Rufus Wood, and signed by ■.the defendants C. Shirey and C. A. Snyder. The note was indorsed by Wood to the plaintiff. It is not a *499negotiable instrument, and Shirey and Snyder made defense thereto the same as if there had been no indorsement.

The facts attending the execution of the note are as follows: Rufus Wood resides at Lexington, in the state of Illinois. He is an importer and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mann v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  2. Holmes v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  3. Rohrabacher v. WareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  4. Nixon & Co. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hinman v. TreinenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. Beach v. BeachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Jandt v. PotthastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API