Legal Opinion

Sunny Misun Kim v. Scottsdale Indemnity Company

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 16, 2022No. 2:21-cv-09642Unknown

1Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-09642-ODW-JPR Document 12 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 21 Page ID #:123 O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 SUNNY MISUN KIM, et al. Case № 2:21-cv-02185-ODW (JPRx) Consol.: 2:21-cv-09642-ODW (JPRx) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ 14 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 15 COMPANY, et al., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. [29] [33] 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiffs Sunny Misun Kim and LA 1 Realty, Inc. bring these consolidated 19 insurance defense actions against Defendants…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API