Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hokr v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1977No. 51997Published

1ConcurrenceOnion, Presiding Judge

In the instant bond forfeiture case at the hearing on whether the judgment nisi should be made final the judgment nisi was not introduced into evidence. Only the bail bond was introduced by the State. In the appellate record before us is the judgment nisi, regular on its face, signed by the County Judge before whom the aforesaid hearing was conducted.

It is well established that both the bond and the judgment nisi must be introduced into evidence to support a final judgment of forfeiture. See Fears v. State, 500 S.W.2d 815 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Purkey v. State, 494 S.W.2d 541 (Tex.Cr.App.1973),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Shropshire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Douglass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
  5. Purkey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API