Legal Opinion

Douglass v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1888No. 5911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Kerr. Tried below before the Hon. T. M. Paschal. The opinions disclose,the nature of the case. The amount of the bond adjudged was eight hundred dollars

1Opinion of the Court

Willson, Judge.

The bail bond obligates the principal to appear “at the next term of the district court of Kerr county, Texas, at the court house in the town of Kerrville, on the eighth Monday after the first Monday in March, it being May 2, 1887.” At the time specified a legal term of said court could not be held, and no term was then held, hut on the ninth day of May, that being the ninth Monday after the first Monday in March, 1887, a legal term of said court was held, at which term said bail bond was declared forfeited.

In answer to the citation issued upon the judgment nisi, defendants…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Joe's Bonding Company v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Sheppard v. GillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. MacKintosh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  4. West v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  5. Balboa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API