Purkey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a final judgment upon forfeiture of an appearance bond. Appellants are the sureties on the bond.
Appellants cite two points of error, only one of which we need consider. In their second point of error, appellants allege that though the State introduced into evidence the indictment, the bond, and the docket sheet, the judgment nisi was never tendered into evidence. Appellants’ point is well taken. A review of the statement of facts reflects that the State never introduced the judgment nisi into evidence. The State concedes error.
The judgment nisi is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Moreland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hokr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Fears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Hokr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Hokr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.