Legal Opinion
Kaiser v. Raoul's Restaurant Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 22, 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*540Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered May 30, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants-appellants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss plaintiffs cause of action for age discrimination against the two individual defendants, who are owners and officers of the corporate defendant, plaintiffs former employer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Patrowich v Chemical Bank (63 NY2d 541, 543 [1984]) has been broadly read to adopt the “economic reality” test for determining who may be sued as an “employer” under the Human Rights Law (Executive…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Strauss v. New York State Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Gallegos v. Elite Model Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Barbato v. BowdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Pepler v. CoyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- White v. Pacifica FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Griffin v. Sirva Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Suffolk Laundry Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Miloscia v. B.R. Guest Holdings LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2011
- Doe v. Bloomberg, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019