Legal Opinion

Starr v. Freeport Dodge, Inc.

New York District Court

Decided July 3, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard Tomson, J.

These cross motions for summary judgment raise, apparently for the first time in this State, the important question as to whether, under the Uniform Commercial Code, part payment exempts an indivisible contract from the operation of the Statute of Frauds. The issue seems to have been considered in only one reported case, Williamson v. Marts (11 Pa. D. & C. 2d 33 [1956]).

Plaintiff’s action is for breach of contract and arises out of the attempted purchase by him of a new automobile from the corporate defendant, a car dealer, through the individual defendant, the salesman involved in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. Bryant Paper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Security National Bank v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. John Thallon & Co. v. Edsil Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Williamson v. Martz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1956

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Songbird Jet Ltd., Inc. v. Amax Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Paloukos v. Intermountain Chevrolet Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sedmak v. Charlie's Chevrolet, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Thomaier v. Hoffman Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Lockwood v. SmigelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API