Legal Opinion

Lee v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided September 21, 1998No. Civil Action 97-32-B-M1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

POLOZOLA, Chief Judge.

This case, alleging arbitrary and capricious refusal by Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (“Sun Life”) to pay benefits under its policy, is before the Court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons which follow, defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff, Janet Lee, originally filed the instant action on December 20, 1997 in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for East Baton Rouge Parish. Plaintiff claims that she became disabled in September 1993 as a result of cervical and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clancy v. Employers Health InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1999
  2. Stoffels Ex Rel. SBC Telephone Concession Plan v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
  3. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co. v. SharplessDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API