Lee v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
POLOZOLA, Chief Judge.
This case, alleging arbitrary and capricious refusal by Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (“Sun Life”) to pay benefits under its policy, is before the Court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons which follow, defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff, Janet Lee, originally filed the instant action on December 20, 1997 in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for East Baton Rouge Parish. Plaintiff claims that she became disabled in September 1993 as a result of cervical and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clancy v. Employers Health InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1999
- Stoffels Ex Rel. SBC Telephone Concession Plan v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co. v. SharplessDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2003