People v. Whisenand
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
Having pled guilty to one count of embezzlement (Pen. Code, § 503), defendant appeals to challenge a victim restitution order made after a lengthy restitution hearing. Specifically, she contends that the trial court erred (1) in awarding interest on the actual losses to the victim; (2) expressly finding that she had the ability to pay for the services of court-appointed counsel; (3) impliedly finding that she had the ability to pay the restitution award; and (4) in ordering her to pay costs of court-appointed counsel, costs of the probation report, and costs of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. BroussardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. BaumannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. Johnny M.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. MearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. ValtakisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. CainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.