Legal Opinion

People v. Whisenand

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1995No. E013454PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

Having pled guilty to one count of embezzlement (Pen. Code, § 503), defendant appeals to challenge a victim restitution order made after a lengthy restitution hearing. Specifically, she contends that the trial court erred (1) in awarding interest on the actual losses to the victim; (2) expressly finding that she had the ability to pay for the services of court-appointed counsel; (3) impliedly finding that she had the ability to pay the restitution award; and (4) in ordering her to pay costs of court-appointed counsel, costs of the probation report, and costs of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. BroussardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. BaumannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. Johnny M.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. People v. MearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. People v. ValtakisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. People v. CainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API