Legal Opinion

Morales v. Westinghouse Hanford Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 15, 1994No. 12585-8-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

— Luis Morales filed suit against Rockwell Hanford Operations and Rockwell International Corporation (Rockwell) and Westinghouse Hanford Company and Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) for racial discrimination. The trial court found that Mr. Morales’ suit was time barred by the statute of limitations and granted the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. RCW 4.16.080(2). On appeal, Mr. Morales contends the 3-year statute of limitations was tolled while he exhausted his remedies under the grievance procedure provided for in his collective bargaining agreement. We affirm.

I

Mr.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bates Technical CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Smith v. Bates Technical CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Keenan v. AllanDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1995
  4. Wilson v. City of MonroeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Milligan v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API