Legal Opinion

Hill v. Union Gas & Electric Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1935No. 4792PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATTHEWS, J.

Prom the testimony of witnesses and the photographs, it is deducible that the defendant’s automobile struck the left side of the plaintiff’s automobile just back of the left front wheel and scraped along the left side to the back of the automobile. It is deducible from this that at the time of the collision the plaintiff’s automobile was facing in an easterly or southeasterly direction.

The principal ground urged in support of the judgment is, that the evidence construed most favorably to the plaintiff discloses that the collision was caused either by his sole or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd. Co. v. RohrsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Michalec, Admr. v. HutchisonOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Youngstown & Suburban Ry. Co. v. FaulkOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. KuncicOhio Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cooley v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API