Hill v. Union Gas & Electric Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.
Prom the testimony of witnesses and the photographs, it is deducible that the defendant’s automobile struck the left side of the plaintiff’s automobile just back of the left front wheel and scraped along the left side to the back of the automobile. It is deducible from this that at the time of the collision the plaintiff’s automobile was facing in an easterly or southeasterly direction.
The principal ground urged in support of the judgment is, that the evidence construed most favorably to the plaintiff discloses that the collision was caused either by his sole or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd. Co. v. RohrsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Michalec, Admr. v. HutchisonOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Youngstown & Suburban Ry. Co. v. FaulkOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. KuncicOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cooley v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950