Legal Opinion
Briggs v. Briggs
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 2019No. 28647PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
#28647-SRJ
2019 S.D. 37
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** In the Matter of the CERTIFICATION OF A QUESTION OF LAW FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA, SOUTHERN DIVISION, Pursuant to the Provisions of SDCL 15-24A-1, and Concerning Federal Action Civ. 4:17-cv-04167-KES, Titled as Follows: **** THOMAS BRIGGS, Plaintiff, v. JUDITH BRIGGS, Defendant. **** ORIGINAL PROCEEDING **** DANIEL R. FRITZ, II MARY A. AKKERMAN TIMOTHY R. RAHN of Ballard Spahr LLP Sioux Falls, South Dakota Attorneys for plaintiff and non-moving party. PAUL T. VAN OLSON SHEILA S.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Losser v. BradstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Virginia O. Kinsel, as Attorney-In-Fact for J. Frank Kinsel, J. Frank Kinsel, Jr., Carole K. Edwards, and Catherine K. Collins v. Jane O. Lindsey, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the Lesey B. Kinsel Trust, Robert N. Oliver, Keith Branyon and Jackson Walker, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re the Estate of DokkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamen v. Hamlin Cnty.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Estate of TankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Estate of Lynch v. LynchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023