Brooks v. Bienkowski
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SALMON, Judge.
We are called upon to decide whether this Court, in entertaining an appeal from a judgment entered by a circuit court in banc panel, is restricted to reviewing the record provided to that panel or whether our review is of the record that was before the trial judge, even though some of that record was not before the in banc panel. This same issue was mentioned, but not decided, in Langston v. Langston, 136 Md.App. 203, 219-22, 764 A.2d 378 (2000), aff'd, 366 Md. 490, 784 A.2d 1086 (2001), and Azar v. Adams, 117 Md.App. 426, 431-34, 700 A.2d 821 (1997). We shall hold that we must…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Buck v. Cam's Broadloom Rugs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bienkowski v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Moore v. MatthewsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Edsall v. HuffakerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Abrishamian v. BarbelyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009