Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Consolidated HGM Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided January 8, 2004No. 07-02-0503-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

Gamaliel Ramirez, Jr. and Christina Ramirez (the Ramirezes) appeal from a final summary judgment denying them recovery against Consolidated HGM Corporation (HGM). Their five issues concern whether the trial court erred in granting HGM’s motions to quash service of process and for summary judgment. Through the former, HGM contended that it was improperly served with citation given that an individual other than the corporation’s registered agent (to whom the certified mail was addressed) signed for and received the process. Through the motion for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ellibee v. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Miller v. MorrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Anthony B. Mena v. Paul Lenz, M.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  4. Anthony B. Mena v. Paul Lenz, M.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. Browserweb Media Agency v. Maxus Energy Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API