Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ellis Campbell, Jr., Director of Internal Revenue for the Second Collection District of Texas v. Great National Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 18, 1955No. 15005_1Published

1DissentRives, Circuit Judge

With much deference to the clear, concise, and forceful opinion of the majority, and to the able opinion of the district court reported in 119 F.Supp. 57, et seq., I am constrained to dissent.

As an academic exercise in semantics, it seems to me that either the affirmative or the negative can be proved that is, that the word “rents” includes royalties, or that it does not include royalties. It has often been used in both senses as is demonstrated by a reference to the many cases collected under the subheading “royalty” to the word “rent” in 36 Words and Phrases, pp. 912-914, and the pocket…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Burton-Sutton Oil Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Helvering v. Midland Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Kirby Petroleum Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API