Legal Opinion

State v. Redwine

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 1986No. 84-400-C; CA A35146PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for kidnapping in the first degree, robbery in the first degree and assault in the first degree. The issue is whether his testimony was improperly limited by the trial court because he had failed to provide a notice of alibi pursuant to ORS 135.455.1 We affirm.

It is not necessary to detail the facts of the crimes to address defendant’s claim of error. The victim, Taylor, who was acquainted with defendant and two codefendants, was taken to a house which was not defendant’s residence at about 5:30 p.m. on the day of the crimes. Defendant was at the house, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCarty v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. Paniagua-MontesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. McCarty v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. McCarty v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API