Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCarty v. State

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1988No. 17651Published

1DissentStowers, Justice

I must disagree with the majority’s holding that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding alibi testimony of two defense witnesses as a sanction for defendant’s failure to comply with the notice of alibi rule.

SCRA 1986, 5-508(A) provides in relevant part “a defendant who intends to offer evidence of an alibi in his defense shall, not less than ten (10) days before trial ... serve upon [the] district attorney a notice in writing of his intention to claim such alibi.” (emphasis added). Defendant in the instant case totally failed to comply with this rule. He did not submit a notice of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Robert Harold FENDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert GOLDSMITH, and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. SimonsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API