Boisnot v. Wilson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Harry S. Boisnot, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 12th day of May, 1904, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a reference.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
The action is to recover a sum of money based upon a contract of employment, whereby the defendant employed the plaintiff to *490take charge of and manage his business as a druggist at Broadway and Thirty-fourth street, in the city of New York, and agreed to pay the plaintiff for his services one-third of the profits óf the said business, and in addition thereto the Sum of $125 per - month. The complaint set out the contract and alleged that the plaintiff entered into such employment on the 15th day of December, 1889, and continued therein until the 1st of November, 1903 ; that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rowland v. . RowlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by12 opinions
- Prentice v. HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Jasne v. JasneNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Konheim v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Lockwood v. Bedell Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Franceschi v. Corte de Distrito de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.