Legal Opinion
Sandor v. New Hampshire Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 22, 1997No. SC 15588PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
This appeal requires us to determine whether, under General Statutes § 14-60(a),1 the insurer *794of an automobile dealer must provide primary uninsured motorist benefits when, in the course of a borrower’s authorized test drive of an insured vehicle, a passenger in the vehicle is injured as a result of the negligence of an uninsured third party tortfeasor. The defendant, New Hampshire Insurance Company, appeals from the judgment of the trial court upholding the ruling by an arbitration panel that the defendant, the insurer of Jim’s Auto Repair (Jim’s Auto), and not the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Whitfield v. Empire Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Florestal v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Garcia v. ITT Hartford InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Gohel v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Rutter v. JanisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Russbach v. Yanez-VenturaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.