Legal Opinion

D. Ghirardelli Co. v. Hunsicker

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1912No. S.F. No. 5882PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

ANGELLOTTI. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment enjoining defendants from selling or offering to sell a product of plaintiff known as Ghirardelli’s ground chocolate, except at prices in direct conformity with the schedule embodied in the notice or label attached to plaintiff’s product, which declares the fixed minimum retail price to be thirty cents for one lb. tins and eighty cents for three lb. tins. The judgment was entered upon defendants’ failure to answer, after their demurrer to the complaint had been overruled. The demurrer was practically a general demurrer for want of facts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  3. Grogan v. ChaffeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Garst v. Hall & Lyon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Washer v. Independent Mining & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor LunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People v. Building Maintenance Contractors' Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API