Cincinnati Seating Co. v. Neiry
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Daviess Circuit Court; H. Q. Houghton, Judge. Action by James L. Neiry against the Cincinnati Seating Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals,
1Opinion of the CourtRoby, P. J.
Action by appellee. The complaint is in one paragraph. . It is founded on §7087i Burns 1901, Acts 1899, p. 231, §9. The particular negligence relied upon was the failure of appellant properly to guard the knives on a woodworking machine, known as a joiner, used in a factory operated by appellant. It is averred that the machine could have been made safe by a proper guard, and because of appellant’s negligence in that behalf appellee, who was in its employ, was injured by having four fingers cut off.
1. The only error assigned is that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Johnson v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Westervelt v. National Paper & Supply Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
- White v. Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- American Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. SiskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lowe v. TalbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- Pinnell v. CutsingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Wabash Portland Cement Co. v. EvartsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922