Legal Opinion

Pinnell v. Cutsinger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1909No. 6,717PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Johnson Circuit Court; William E. Deupree, Judge. Action by George W. Cutsinger against Julius W. Pinnell and another. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $4,000, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRabb, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellee against appellants, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by appellee while in appellants’ service at their planing-mill, and alleged to have been caused by appellants’ negligence in failing to comply with section nine of the factory act (Acts 1899, p. 231, §8029 Burns 1908), requiring dangerous machinery to be guarded.

The questions presented by the record arise upon the action of the court below in overruling appellants ’ motion for judgment in their favor upon answers to interrogatories returned by the jury with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis Coal Co. v. PollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. CavanaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Blanchard-Hamilton Furniture Co. v. ColvinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. McGinty v. WatermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Cincinnati Seating Co. v. NeiryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Camenzind v. Freeland Furniture Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. American Maize Products Co. v. WidigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. OesterlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. CoughlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Illinois Car & Manufacturing Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API