Legal Opinion

Pullen v. Headberg

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1912No. 7431PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Dem/er Cotmty Court. — Hon. H. S. Class, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues

court:

1. This action grows out of an attempt to collect upon execution' a judgment in favor of Mrs. Headberg, against O. C. Wilson. September 23, 1910, a constable levied an execution upon the rights or shares, owned or held by AVilson in The Interstate Business Exchange Corporation, in the manner provided by section 3619, R. S. The secretary was out of town; Pullen, a mere employe, was in charge of the office, *504acting as secretary, and Clarkson was treasurer; The officer requested Pullen to give him a certificate showing the number of rights or shares Wilson owned, or which were held in trust…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martens v. ReillyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Spreckels v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Field v. SiegelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People ex rel. Adams v. Goss & Phillips Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Archuleta v. ArchuletaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Morrison v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  2. Ettenson v. BurkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. McGlasson v. BargerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Lockwood Grader Corp. v. BockhausSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  5. Armijo v. National Surety Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API