Legal Opinion
State v. LaMar
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 2004No. 2004-0504PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Appellant, Keith LaMar, challenges the denial of his application to reopen his direct appeal under App.R. 26(B).
{¶ 2} LaMar was tried and convicted in 1995 in Lawrence County for murdering five of his fellow inmates during the 1993 Lucasville prison riot. LaMar was sentenced to death for four of the five murders. The court of appeals affirmed his convictions and the death sentences in 1998. State v. LaMar (Aug. 13, 1998), Lawrence App. No. 95CA31, 1998 WL 514548. We then affirmed the appellate *468court’s judgment. State v. LaMar, 95 Ohio St.3d 181, 2002-Ohio-2128, 767 N.E.2d 166.
{¶ 3} On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WinsteadOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- George T. Franklin, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carl S. Anderson, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Parker v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Keith LaMar v. Marc HoukCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AlmashniOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.