Legal Opinion

State v. Winstead

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1996No. 95-816PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Per curiam

The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. We agree that a courier’s delay in delivery is not “good cause” for accepting an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening that is untimely filed. Moreover, there is. no denial of due process or equal protection in applying to this appellant a rule applicable to all appellants.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

2Cited by81 opinions

  1. State v. GummOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kenneth T. Richey v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. State v. TwyfordOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. WinsteadOhio Supreme Court · 1996

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API