State v. Farrell
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction, E. A. Noonan, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, J.
Upon information filed, the defendant was convicted of having unlawfully in his possession, and of unlawfully selling in this city pinnated grouse, within the season when the catching and killing of said birds is prohibited by law. He was fined for each offence. The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of' facts, whereby the defendant admitted the possession and sale of the birds as charged, and the state admitted that the birds were killed partly outside of this state, and partly in this state,- at a season when the killing was not prohibited. • • ......
The defendant, thereupon, took an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. RandolphMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
- State v. JudyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879
3Cited by12 opinions
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Haggerty v. St. Louis Ice Manufacturing & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- State v. SchumanOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. HegerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.