Hanna v. Maas
Supreme Court of the United States
error to the circuit court of the united states for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
This action was brought by Maas and others, citizens of Marquette. in the State of Michigan, against Hanna and others, commission merchants and citizens of Cleveland in the State of Ohio, upon this contract, signed by the defendants and addressed to the plaintiffs’ agent:
“Marquette, Mich., August 22, 18J4. We will advance $25.25 per ton on 500 to 1000 tons” (increased by supplemental contract to 2000 tons) “Michigan charcoal pig iron, when delivered at Cleveland.”
At the trial the plaintiffs introduced evidence tending to prove that such iron, on which the plaintiffs had advanced $20 a ton,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Thompson v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Railway Co. v. HeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Pomeroy's Lessee v. State Bank of Ind.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Young v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ward v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Krauss Brothers Lumber Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.