Railway Co. v. Heck
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. The facts are' stated in the opinion of the' court.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr.-Chief. Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
It' does' not appear from this record that any exceptions were taken in the progress of the trial to what Was done by the court below. • Nearly three weeks after the "trial was concluded and a verdict "rendered, a motion was made- for a new trial, because of certain alleged errors in the charge; but it is nowhere s.hown that they were noted or brought to the attention of .the-.court before the verdict. Certainly no exceptions were taken. A trial court may, in the exercise of its judicial discretion, grant a new trial, if. convinced…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Schuchardt v. AllensSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
3Cited by64 opinions
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Crumpton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boesch v. GraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Marks v. Leo Feist, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.