Legal Opinion

Weigand v. Anderson-Meyer Drilling Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1988No. 87-258PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Defendants Anderson-Meyer Drilling Company and Home Insurance Company appeal from the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court. The Workers’ Compensation Court held that Frank Weigand is not barred from compensation by the statute of limitations provision, Section 39-71-601(1), MCA. The court further held that the Weigand’s present condition is the result of a previous compensable injury and thus the defendants are liable. We affirm.

The defendants present two issues on appeal. They are:(1) Whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in finding that Weigand satisfied the filing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ridenour v. Equity Supply Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Viets v. Sweet Grass CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Poppleton v. Rollins, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Klein v. Independent Wholesale Associated Grocers & State Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Scott v. Utility Line ContractorsMontana Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schaub v. Vita Rich DairyMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re the Workers' Compensation Death Benefits of GaitherMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Grenz v. Fire and Cas. of ConnecticutMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Richardson v. Indem. Ins. Co. of N. Am.Montana Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Weigand v. Anderson-Meyer Drilling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API