Legal Opinion

In re City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

The instant proceeding involves a controversy as to title between the Superintendent of Insurance as liquidator of the New York Title and Mortgage Company and Jay Coogan with respect to damage parcels 2, 3, 4 and 5, and a similar conflict exists as to damage parcel 6 between the superintendent and Jay Coogan, Gardiner Coogan, W. Gordon Coogan and Sarah Jessie Coogan, as heirs and descendants of Harriet G. Coogan, who died intestate, on December 18, 1947.

The claims of Jay Coogan originally included damage parcels 2, 3, 4 and 5 but at the trial herein the parties agreed to eliminate damage…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Belotti v. . BickhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Ten Eyck v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Crouch v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Smith v. Algona Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co. v. . WendelNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HelinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API