Weinstein v. Siemens
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SIEMENS CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
Now before the Court is Defendant Siemens Corporation’s (“Siemens”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. A hearing was held on October 21, 2009. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
This action arises from a tragic accident that occurred on May 3, 2005. Thomas Wellinger, then an employee of UGS Corporation, now doing business as Siemens (hereinafter referred to as Siemens), was on…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fremont Reorganizing Corp. v. DukeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Weinstein v. SiemensDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010