Legal Opinion

Coggins v. Shilling

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 19, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

30 N.J. Super. 26 (1954)

103 A.2d 171

BLANCHE M. COGGINS AND JOHN COGGINS, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

HELEN S. SHILLING, CHARLES F. SHILLING AND FRANCIS WEST, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided February 19, 1954.

Mr. Harry M. Tonkin, attorney for plaintiffs.

Mr. Robert K. Bell, attorney for defendants.

HANEMAN, J.S.C.

Plaintiffs herein seek to establish an easement of way by prescription.

The facts in connection herewith are as follows: Plaintiffs are the owners of premises known as Colonial Hotel, 831 Atlantic Avenue, Ocean City, New Jersey. Adjoining and adjacent on the westerly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Plaza v. FlakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Deregibus v. Silberman Furniture Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Abatiell v. MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
  4. Welitoff v. KohlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  5. Mitchell v. D'OlierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. WorthingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ammer v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Di Pasco v. ProsserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Estate of Einsiedler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  5. Sanders v. WorthingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API