Legal Opinion
Tyroler v. Continental Casualty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 7, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGivern, J.
The plaintiff, a woman over 90 years of age, was issued in 1961 by the defendant insurance company a medical policy described in bold print as a “ 5000 Reserve Hospital Policy ”, “ available only to persons over 65 years of age. ’’ She paid the premiums as they became due and the company accepted them. Come the year 1965-66, she became ill and entered the Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City. On recommendation of her attending physician, special duty or private nurses were engaged through the nurse’s registry at the hospital. These nursing charges appeared on the bills received by the plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lachs v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Houlihan v. . Preferred Accident Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Whiteside v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prince v. ITT Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Victory Container Corp. v. Sphere InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Yankelevitz v. Royal Globe InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Transamerica Insurance v. Bellefonte InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Troncillito v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.