Legal Opinion

United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 15, 1982No. Crim. 81-396PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge:

In this proceeding several major railroad companies are charged with criminal conduct in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1977). The defendants, Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. (B&O), Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Inc. (B&LE), Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Inc. (C&O), and Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Inc. (N&W), are charged with engaging in a combination and conspiracy in unreasonable restraint of trade and commerce which inhibited or eliminated competition among dock companies…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Armco Steel Co., LP v. CSX Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  2. United States v. Bessemer & Lake Erie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Norman J. TannenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Valderrama CarvajalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. United States v. BenjaminDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API