Legal Opinion
Henkel Corp. v. Coral, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 6, 1991No. 89 C 3385PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PARSONS, District Judge.
BACKGROUND 1
The plaintiff, Henkel Corporation (“Henkel”) brought this action seeking at the outset a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendant, Coral, Inc. (“Coral”) from infringing Henkel’s patent United States Patent No. Re. 32,661, by manufacturing and selling a low temperature cleaner called Cieñe 100/ACC-2 to manufacturers of aluminum cans for the food and beverage industry. The defendant responded with a motion for summary judgment. The matter proceeded in its early stages before the court on both matters, the parties supporting…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. Custom Optical Frames, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Earth Resources Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- University of Virginia Patent Foundation v. General Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2011
- Baskin-Robbins Inc. v. PatelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Haden Schweitzer Corp. v. Arthur B. Myr Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.