Legal Opinion
United States v. Bliss
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided December 31, 1990No. 84-200C(1)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NANGLE, Senior District Judge.
This matter is now before the Court on the joint motion of Missouri and the United States to enter two consent decrees formulated in lengthy negotiations with two groups of the principal corporate defendants in this action, the Syntex defendants1 and the NEPACCO *561defendants.2 The consent decrees were lodged with the Court on July 24 and July 26, 1990. In accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 9622(d)(2) and 28 C.F.R. § 50.7, notice of lodging of the consent decrees was published in the Federal Register on August 8, 1990, at 55 Fed.Reg. 32319-20, and a thirty-day…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Armstrong v. Board of School DirectorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,576 Securities and Exchange Commission v. James H. Randolph, Jr., and Charles BlackardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Cannons Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Citizens for A Better Environment v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States of America v. Charles George Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BP Exploration & Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001
- Insurance Company Of The State Of Pennsylvania v. Syntex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Union Elec. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994
- Insurance Co. v. Syntex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.