Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Gila County

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1941No. Civil No. 4297PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

This is an appeal by Southern Pacific Company, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, from a judgment against it in an action which it had brought against Gila county. The City of Globe, a municipal corporation, and the Town of Miami, a municipal corporation, were brought in as defendants by order of the court. The facts in the case are not in dispute, and may be stated as follows:

Three separate suits were filed by plaintiff against Gila County for the purpose of recovering taxes paid under protest to the county for the benefit of the City of Globe and the Town of Miami, being numbered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coggins v. ElyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Arizona Eastern Railroad v. MatthewsArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hicks v. KrigbaumArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hoy v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State Land Department v. Tucson Rock and Sand Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API