Legal Opinion

National Life & Accident Insurance v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided September 24, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson —

Reversing.

The competency of the evidence offered by the insurer bearing on the right of Drucilla Jones, the beneficiary, to recover on the “double indemnity clause” of an insurance policy, issued by the National Life & Accident Insurance Company of Nashville, Tenn., to Fred Jones, is the question presented for determination

The policy was issued August 7, 1933, to Fred. Jones for a weekly premium of 15 cents; the amount payable in the event of his death was $210.

On a trial to a jury the beneficiary introduced evidence to establish her right to recover…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hesse v. Traveler's Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Taliaferro v. Travelers' Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. HeywardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tennessee v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
  4. Kentucky Central Life Insurance Co. v. WillettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  5. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API