Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Thorndike

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 27, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a petition to establish exceptions. Motion to dismiss the petition has been made alleging various grounds.

1. The petition is sufficiently “verified by affidavit,” as required by Rule 6 of the full court rules. The signature of the petitioner, together with the jurat of an authorized magistrate that the petition has been subscribed and sworn to before him, has been held to be compliance with the rule. Rowse, petitioner, 195 Mass. 216, 218.

2. It is customary that the affidavit filed with the petition should contain verification of the fact that the petitioner before filing the petition…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Moneyweight Scale Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. BishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. John Henry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Lord v. RowseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Walsh v. FeinsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. ThorndikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Commonwealth v. KossowanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Hodgerney v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Donovan v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API