Legal Opinion

Thorndike

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 11, 1926PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These are three separate petitions to establish the truth of exceptions. They all relate to the same original case, which hitherto has been before this court on four petitions to establish exceptions, two reported respectively in 244 Mass. 429; 252 Mass. 154, and two reported in *410254 Mass. 256, and on another such petition dismissed on January 30, 1926, without opinion on the authority of 254 Mass. 256. Thus five such petitions after verdict have already been passed upon in a single case.

No copy of the alleged bill of exceptions is attached to the first one of the present petitions filed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Bar Ass'n v. CaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Rudnicki v. McCormackDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
  3. Martell v. MoffattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Cohen v. Industrial Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Pepper v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API