Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Kossowan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 2, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
After trial and verdict of guilty, the defendant filed a bill of exceptions which was disallowed before sentence was imposed. The defendant filed a petition in the Supreme Judicial Court to establish the truth of those exceptions. That petition was dismissed by rescript containing as the brief statement of the reasons for decision this: “Case governed by Thorndike, petitioner, 244 Mass. 429, and by Bishop, petitioner, 208 Mass. 405, 407, and Koch, petitioner, 225 Mass. 148, 150.” No opinion was written. Thus it was adjudged that the exceptions were without merit. Reynolds, petitioner, 253…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Ashley v. Three Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Cheney v. CoughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Weil v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Lebowitch v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Commonwealth v. DoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Clancy v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Commonwealth v. VallarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- City of Boston v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.