Legal Opinion

Burge v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1996No. 22284PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCHINI, Justice.

Appellee Dale Burge (“Burge”) was involved in a traffic collision with uninsured motorist Michael Sanchez (“Sanchez”). Burge brought a negligence action against Sanchez1 in district court in Taos (“Burge I ”). At approximately the same time, Burge filed a separate action against his insurance carrier, Appellant Mid-Continent Casualty Company (Mid-Continent) in district court in Albuquerque (“Burge II ”), alleging breach of contract and bad faith. While neither Burge nor Mid-Continent sought to consolidate the two suits, Mid-Continent did attempt to intervene in Burge…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. Paiz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bartlett v. New Mexico Welding Supply, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Stevenson v. Louis Dreyfus Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. West American Insurance v. PopaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Kalamazoo Oil Co. v. BoermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Ortiz v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  4. Lopez v. Delta Int'l Mach. Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
  5. Murken v. Solv-Ex Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API