Legal Opinion
Graudins v. Retro Fitness, LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 5, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-6466PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
Victoria Graudins has filed a wide-ranging complaint against Retro Fitness, LLC, Daniel Kraft, Jim Kanagie, Dan Carr, and Paul Carr that includes hostile work environment and retaliation claims under Title VII as well as a variety of state law claims. *460In response, the Defendants (with the exception of Paul Carr) filed a motion for partial summary judgment and a motion to sever. For the following reasons, the Court denies the motion to sever and grants in part and denies in part the motion for partial summary judgment.
I. Background
A. Procedural…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mandel v. M & Q Packaging Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hills v. Borough of ColwynDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- ALLEN v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- BURNS v. SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- CLARKEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.