Legal Opinion
Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 19, 2003No. A03-124, A03-155PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellant University of Minnesota Board of Regents (the board) conducted closed meetings with selected candidates for the university presidency and refused the requests of respondents, print media news organizations, for data on the unsuccessful candidates. Respondents then brought this action, alleging violations of the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Minn. Stat. §§ 13D.01-.07 (2002) (OML), and the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, MinmStat. §§ 13.01-.90 (2002) (DPA); respondents also sought an order compelling disclosure of the data on the unsuccessful candidates and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Federated Publications, Inc v. Michigan State University Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- BD. OF TRUSTEES v. Miss. Publishers Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Regents of the University of Minnesota v. LordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Integra Telecom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Bradley Dean Derksen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024