Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Westinghouse Credit Co., Inc.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 1974No. Civ-74-110-EPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EUBANKS, District Judge.

This ease was removed from the District Court in and for Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma, upon the petition of the Defendants. The Plaintiffs had brought suit against the Defendants under the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1681p to recover $690.00 actual damages by virtue of alleged false credit representations of the Defendants. The Petition further alleged that the false representations were wilful and malicious on the part of the Defendants and that same were designed to cause injury to the Plaintiffs, for which false…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Booth v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
  2. Wingate v. General Auto Parts Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1941
  3. Kuligowski v. HartDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1941

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rasor v. Retail Credit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lockard v. Equifax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Haun v. Retail Credit Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Sicinski v. Reliance Funding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Broom v. TRW Credit DataDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API