Legal Opinion

Kuligowski v. Hart

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 25, 1941No. 20689PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge.

In an action filed in the Court of Common Pleas for Cuyahoga County, Ohio, the plaintiffs seek to recover on behalf of themselves, and other employees of the defendant, overtime compensation as provided by the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act. 29 U.S.C.A. § 216. The defendant has removed the case here on the ground that it arises under the Constitution and laws of" the United States; that it involves a substantial Federal question; and, that the sum in dispute exceeds the jurisdictional amount. The plaintiffs have filed a motion to remand. The case, as made in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Johnson v. Butler Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  3. Booth v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
  4. Brantley v. Augusta Ice & Coal Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943
  5. Garner v. Mengel Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API