Legal Opinion
Baksalary v. Smith
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 8, 1984No. Civ. A. 76-429PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
I. INTRODUCTION
We have previously resolved the central constitutional issues in this case. Baksalary v. Smith, 579 F.Supp. 218 (E.D.Pa.1984). We now address the question of what remedy our prior holdings require or permit. The named parties to this bilateral class action have submitted for approval a proposed consent decree which undertakes to resolve all but one of the remaining remedial issues. The proposed consent decree accompanies this Opinion as an appendix. The remedial issue not dealt with by the consent decree has been submitted to the court to be determined as a litigated…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Arnott v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807 v. Regional Import & Export Trucking Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Baksalary v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.