Legal Opinion · Dissent

Acme Builders, Inc. v. Facilities Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1979Published

1Dissent

Sweeney and Main, JJ.,

dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum by Sweeney, J. Sweeney, J (dissenting). While the drawings in question illustrate painting to be done to the floor, base, wall and ceiling of the existing boiler room, the specifications refer, in general, to the painting of surfaces which have been disturbed due to alteration work. In our view, the language used creates an ambiguity in the contract. Where such an ambiguity is found, the situation of the parties and the surrounding circumstances attendant upon the making of the contract are to be taken into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grow Construction Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Mister Filters, Inc. v. Weber Environmental SystemsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Shore Bridge Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
  4. Mars Associates, Inc. & Normel Construction Corp. Joint Venturers v. Health & Mental Hygiene Facilities Improvement Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. MARS ASSOCS., INC. & NORMEL CONSTR. CORP. v. Health & Mental Hygiene Facilities Improvement Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API