Legal Opinion
Shore Bridge Corp. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided March 20, 1946No. Claim No. 27112PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lambíase, J.
On or about the 19th day of October, 1938, claimant and the defendant, State of New York, duly entered into a written contract whereby claimant agreed to furnish all the materials, appliances, tools and labor of every kind required for the reconstruction of the Hornell-Big Creek Bridge No. 1-A and North Approaches, constituting reconstruction contract No. 3998, and for the construction of the Hornell City, Seneca Street-South Approach to the Bridge, constituting contract No. C-38-9, in the county of Steuben, New York, work under the contract to be completed in the most substantial…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gillet v. . Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Patterson v. . MeyerhoferNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Jerome v. RossNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
- Borough Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Dynamics Corp. of America v. International Harvester Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Fehlhaber Corp. & Horn Construction Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Norman Co. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- A & B Enterprises, Inc. v. Hartford InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.