Legal Opinion

State v. Barraza

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 11, 2005No. 1 CA-CR 02-0591PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 Following a jury trial, Mayra Isabel Barraza was convicted of second-degree murder. Barraza claims that the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury on the “crime prevention” justification defense pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 13-411 (2001). We conclude that § 13-411 may not be invoked by an invited guest who is charged with committing a crime against a resident of the home. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction.1

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Gregorio Espinoza, the victim, was found dead at his home on May 5, 2001. He had been…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. HeflinMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. State v. BayardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. State of Arizona v. Andy Daniel AlmeidaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. State v. LoneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API