State v. Barraza
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALL, Judge.
¶ 1 Following a jury trial, Mayra Isabel Barraza was convicted of second-degree murder. Barraza claims that the trial court erred when it refused to instruct the jury on the “crime prevention” justification defense pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 13-411 (2001). We conclude that § 13-411 may not be invoked by an invited guest who is charged with committing a crime against a resident of the home. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction.1
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Gregorio Espinoza, the victim, was found dead at his home on May 5, 2001. He had been…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. HeflinMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. BayardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State of Arizona v. Andy Daniel AlmeidaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. LoneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.